Can the Unconscious Boost Lie-Detection Accuracy?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Can the Unconscious Boost Lie Detection Accuracy ?
The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any ...
متن کاملSome evidence for unconscious lie detection.
To maximize survival and reproductive success, primates evolved the tendency to tell lies and the ability to accurately detect them. Despite the obvious advantage of detecting lies accurately, conscious judgments of veracity are only slightly more accurate than chance. However, findings in forensic psychology, neuroscience, and primatology suggest that lies can be accurately detected when less-...
متن کاملWanted: direct comparisons of unconscious and conscious lie detection.
Commentary We are thankful to Levine and Bond (2014) for engaging in a much-needed discussion about the accuracy of human lie detection. As we understand their Commentary, they make two primary, and related, arguments. Their first argument is that the significant difference that we reported (ten Brinke, Stimson, & Carney, 2014) between conscious, direct and unconscious, indirect truth/lie discr...
متن کاملThe focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge.
People are poor lie detectors, but accuracy can be improved by making the judgment indirectly. In a typical demonstration, participants are not told that the experiment is about deception at all. Instead, they judge whether the speaker appears, say, tense or not. Surprisingly, these indirect judgments better reflect the speaker's veracity. A common explanation is that participants have an impli...
متن کاملUnconscious lie detection as an example of a widespread fallacy in the Neurosciences
Neuroscientists frequently use a certain statistical reasoning to establish the existence of distinct neuronal processes in the brain. We show that this reasoning is flawed and that the large corresponding literature needs reconsideration. We illustrate the fallacy with a recent study that received an enormous press coverage because it concluded that humans detect deceit better if they use unco...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Current Directions in Psychological Science
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0963-7214,1467-8721
DOI: 10.1177/0963721416656348