Formative assessment for all

Acknowledgements The authors gratefully acknowledge the advice given by Nick Boreham and Richard Edwards during the drafting of this paper. We are, of course, indebted to the staff at Discovery School for their willing participation in the research project. Formative assessment for all: a whole school approach to pedagogic change Scotland's Assessment is for Learning initiative (AifL) seeks to introduce a coordinated national system for assessment in schools. Formative assessment is a major plank in this. The initiative has moved beyond its pilot phase and it is intended that it will be adopted by all Scottish schools by 2007. This paper draws upon the case study of a primary school that has adopted a whole school approach to enacting the formative assessment principles of AifL since 2004. The paper utilises Margaret Archer's social theory to analyse and explain the processes of change that have underpinned the development of formative assessment in the school. It argues that meaningful change in schools can be stimulated by encouraging socio-cultural interaction amongst practitioners, via the impetus provided by a central initiative 1 combined with the creation of spaces for dialogue and the extension of professional trust and autonomy. Introduction Continual change seems to be the order of the day within schooling systems worldwide. According to Levin (1998) change has reached 'epidemic' proportions. Nevertheless much of the recent literature suggests that attempts to reform schooling (especially in the related fields of curriculum and pedagogy) have been generally unsuccessful in leading to embedded, long term change in practice (e. centrally initiated curriculum change is unlikely to be successful unless it actively engages the 'practitioners who are the foot-soldiers of every reform aimed at improving student outcomes' reminds us of the 'power of the school and classroom to accommodate, absorb or expel innovations that are at odds with the dominant structures and values that hold habits in place'. According to Priestley (2005), the form and extent of innovation is greatly dependent on the attitudes and values of such practitioners, especially teachers. Top-down innovation tends to disregard the power of teachers to mediate change; successful innovation is often better achieved through a process of adaptation, combining central impetus with active engagement by practitioners. External reform initiatives thus develop in a dialectical fashion, reflecting the dynamic two-way relationship between the initiative, and the context for enactment, including the local change agents. 2 Margaret Archer's (1988) social theory provides a …