Some experimental studies of familiarity and liking
نویسنده
چکیده
What is aesthetically pleasing and why? The answers to this question have immense practical implications for people such as advertisers, educators and broadcasters, as well as great theoretical importance for researchers in the social sciences. The question can be approached from a variety of different viewpoints; the sociologist, for example, might concentrate upon the role of social class or the mass media in shaping people's likes and dislikes, and the anthropologist might undertake cross-cultural comparisons. In the absence of any consistent body of theory on aesthetic preferences in any of these other disciplines. the approach of the experimental psychologist has been to collect data on human preferences in a systematic manner and to develop a theory which is congruent with the empirical findings. Our own attempts at this have developed along new lines, and therefore there is no closely related literature to be surveyed alongside our own work. However, some observations about the historical background of our studies will be useful at the outset. The 19th-century experimental aesthetics ran into difficulty in its endeavour to establish a body of consistent data (Boring. 1957); and so its theories, although very interesting. remained speculative. Thus, aesthetics continued to be on the fringe of psychology (Mace, 1962) until the birth of so-called new experimental aesthetics a decade or so ago. Berlyne (1974) showed new ways forward along experimental paths; and he also tried to root aesthetics in biology (BerIyne, 1971). In the meanwhile Zajonc (1968) drew attention to the effects of mere exposure on human likes and dislikes. This left out important factors influencing favourability, such as stimulus complexity, orderliness and discriminability. and many other stimulus characteristics. Thus, Zajonc's particular attack on the problem of what is pleasing was on a narrow front; and probably because of its narrowness the attack proved fruitful. and it seemed to augur well for the future. Our own approach to data gathering and theory building in the field of aesthetics stemmed likewise from the studies of exposure learning of preferences (Sluckin. 1964); and the approach could also be described as being biologically rooted in a broad sense. To be more specific with regard to the last point. it is interesting to note that the question as to when
منابع مشابه
Does Familiarity Breed Contempt or Liking ?
Reis, Maniaci, Caprariello, Eastwick, and Finkel (2011) conducted 2 studies that demonstrate that in certain cases, familiarity can lead to liking—in seeming contrast to the results of our earlier article (Norton, Frost, & Ariely, 2007). We believe that Reis et al. (a) utilized paradigms far removed from spontaneous, everyday social interactions that were particularly likely to demonstrate a po...
متن کاملThe Effect of Repetition and Expertise on Liking and Complexity in Contemporary Music
Aesthetic perception of music has been extensively researched in the last decades. Numerous studies suggest that listeners find a piece of music more or less pleasant according to its complexity. Experimental results show that complexity and liking have different relationship according to the musical genre examined, and that these two variables are also affected by other factors such as familia...
متن کاملMultiple context mere exposure: Examining the limits of liking.
Recent evidence suggests that increased liking of exposed stimuli-a phenomenon known as the mere exposure effect-is dependent on experiencing the stimuli in the same context at exposure and test. Three experiments extended this work by examining the effect of presenting target stimuli in single and multiple exposure contexts. Target face stimuli were repeatedly paired with nonsense words, which...
متن کاملLess is more: the lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt.
The present research shows that although people believe that learning more about others leads to greater liking, more information about others leads, on average, to less liking. Thus, ambiguity--lacking information about another--leads to liking, whereas familiarity--acquiring more information--can breed contempt. This "less is more" effect is due to the cascading nature of dissimilarity: Once ...
متن کاملImplicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: rethinking the mere exposure effect.
In studies of the mere exposure effect, rapid presentation of items can increase liking without accurate recognition. The effect on liking has been explained as a misattribution of fluency caused by prior presentation. However, fluency is also a source of feelings of familiarity. It is, therefore, surprising that prior experience can enhance liking without also causing familiarity-based recogni...
متن کاملMusic and Emotions in the Brain: Familiarity Matters
The importance of music in our daily life has given rise to an increased number of studies addressing the brain regions involved in its appreciation. Some of these studies controlled only for the familiarity of the stimuli, while others relied on pleasantness ratings, and others still on musical preferences. With a listening test and a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment, we...
متن کامل