Dan Korman and Dustin Locke argue that non-naturalists are rationally committed to withhold moral belief. A main principle in their argument, which they call EC*, can be read either of two ways, I EC*-narrow EC*-wide. show is implausible. Then that, if rely on EC*-wide critique non-naturalism, then the fails. explain how availability a view like occasionalism used respond non-naturalist’s behal...