The Comparative Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback in Process-Based Vs. Product-Based Writing Instruction on EFL Learners` Writing Performance

Authors

  • Neda Osanloo
  • Sholeh Kolahi
Abstract:

This study attempted to systematically inspect the impact of direct and indirect corrective feedbacks on the writing ability of EFL learners when using product/process based instructions. To do so, 110 female EFL learners, between the ages of 15 and 18, were randomly assigned into four experimental groups to receive four different kinds of treatments, namely product-based instruction with direct feedback, product-based instruction with indirect feedback, process-based instruction with direct feedback, and process-based instruction with indirect feedback. The treatment took 10 sessions. Analyzing the results of the two writing tests (pretest and posttest) showed that direct feedback had significant effects on EFL learners' writing in process-based instruction and product-based instruction but indirect feedback failed to show any significant effect on EFL learners' writing in both process-based instruction and product-based instruction. The results also indicated that direct feedback had significantly better impact on EFL learners writing in the process-based instruction than product-based one. 

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

the comparative impact of prompts and recasts in processing instruction versus meaningful output-based instruction on efl learners’ writing accuracy

the purpose of the present study was to see which one of the two instruction-processing instruction (pi) and meaningful output based instruction (mobi) accompanied with prompt and recast- is more effective on efl learners’ writing accuracy. in order to homogenize the participants in term of language proficiency a preliminary english test (pet) was administrated between 74 intermediate students ...

the effect of recast and direct focused written corrective feedback on the grammatical accuracy of iranian efl learners’ writing achievement and retention

the extent to which written corrective feedback on linguistic errors can play a role in helping l2 writers improve the accuracy of their writing continues to be an issue of interest to researchers and teachers since truscott (1996) mounted a case for its abolition. while there is growing empirical evidence that written corrective feedback can successfully target some types of linguistic error (...

The Effect of Type of Corrective Feedback (Direct vs. Indirect) on Iranian Pre-Intermediate EFL Learners' Writing

  This study investigated the effect of gender and type of written corrective feedback (WCF) on Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners’ writing. Four intact classes were assigned to experimental and two intact classes to control groups. The learners were homogenized using a pre-test which was followed by sixteen sessions lasting one hour and forty five minutes. After receiving instruction on how...

full text

the effect of the instruction of metadiscourse maekers on iranian efl learners persuasive writing proficiency

چکیده مهارت نوشتار یکی از مهمترین مهارتهای فرآیند یادگیری و تدریس زبان برای زبان آموزان و مدرسین می باشد. در تحقیق حاضر، تاثیر آموزش نشانه های فراکلام روی مهارت نوشتار متقاعدکننده زبان آموزان سطح متوسط ایرانی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. این تحقیق 40 زبان آموز داشت که توسط آزمون نوشتار تافل(2005) همسان سازی شدند و سپس به دو گروه آموزشی و خطا تقسیم شدند. در ابتدای پژوهش معیارهای نوشتار متقاعدکننده به ...

the effect of audio-taped feedback and conferencing on efl students’ writing ability

: بازخورد یکی از جنبه ها ی ضروری هر دوره ی آموزشی نگارشی – زبانی انگلیسی می باشد که به زبان آموزان مهارت های مورد نیاز جهت بهبود توانایی نگارشی را می آموزد. این تحقیق، با استفاده از طرح پیش آزمون، پس آزمون، و پسا آزمون ، سعی دارد تا تأ?یر نوع بازخورد مدرس در کمک به زبان آموزان جهت بازنویسی نوشته هایشان رابررسی کند ، و آیا اینکه رابطه ای بین نوع بازخورد مدرس و توانایی زبان آموزان در تصحیح غلط ها...

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 9  issue 19

pages  84- 103

publication date 2016-11-01

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023