In the historic decisions in the Jones & Laughlin and companion cases sustaining the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act, the Supreme Court made no attempt to define or particularize the instances in which the invocation of the act by the Labor Board would constitute a valid exercise of the federal power. It contented itself with defining the limits of the Board's jurisdiction...

Constitutional law changes, even though the Constitution remains the same. American abortion law aptly illustrates this point. Although the text of the Fourteenth Amendment has remained constant since the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade [FN1] in 1973, the Court has altered its position on the constitutionality of restrictive abortion statutes. According to Roe, the Due Process C...

This study examines the constitutionality of Indonesia’s Anti-Blasphemy Law, which has been challenged unsuccessfully at Constitutional Court on three occasions, in 2009, 2012, and 2018. While acknowledged law’s provisions are open to multiple interpretations, it insists maintaining law as is, grounds that right religious expression is not absolute, freedom rights restricted under Article 28J 1...

The article examines four cases of the U.S. unilateral withdrawal from international arms control agreements in first two decades 21st century legislative branch perspective. Each precedents is analyzed through resolutions, which were submitted by legislators, order to determine difference approaches Democrats and Republicans issues. Also, paper discusses constitutionality presidential action e...

Critics of Virginia's challenge to the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act have asserted that Virginia lacked standing to even raise the issue. Such criticism is inconsistent with foundational understandings of the role of states in providing a check on federal power and with the modern standing jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, especially as reflected in the C...