The U.S. Supreme Court has made a number of recent rulings in regard to the death penalty that will likely have the effec: sf increasing the use of psychiatry during the trial and sentencing process in capital cases. Any such changes are bound to increase the number of ethical dilemmas faced by psychiatrists involved in such work. The rulings affecting psychiatry include: (1) The Eighth Amendme...

This study intended to review the precedents on plastic surgery medical malpractice lawsuits in lower-court trials, classify the reasons of 'limitation of liability' by type, and suggest a standard in the acknowledgement of limitation of liability ratio. The 30 lower-court's rulings on the cases bearing the medical negligence of the defendants acknowledged the liability ratio of the defendants ...

the dynamism of the verity proposition has led to its being used in various issues and sciences as the founder for the general and constant principles. the principles of jurisprudence, as a science that is the founder for general rules to arrive at legal rulings, utilizes this proposition in many subdivisions of uṣūl (principles) as well as in resolving problems. in fact, if we do not take the ...

Praise be to Allah, and may peace blessings upon His Messenger. This research is entitled (Rulings Of Harassing In Islamic Jurisprudence, Chapter On Acts Worship). I dealt with this in order for the Muslim aware of legal rulings related these issues, definition immolation terms language terminology, as well evidence its legitimacy. From Qur'an Sunnah The pure Prophet jurisprudential it. include...

The article concerns juvenile community services for the benefit of local – an educational measure used by Polish courts. It presents research carried out using three methods: legal-dogmatic method, statistical and case study method. covered 14 cases in which 2013 court obliged juveniles to work (nearly 1% total number such rulings within this year Poland). results show that courts use increasi...

This article explores why national judges remain passive on EU legal integration by examining judges’ reasons for not requesting preliminary rulings from the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The combines insights social psychology and literature role courts in to formulate expectations regarding what type motives guide behaviours. Drawing interviews held with Croatian, Slovenian Swedish judges,...

This article explores the criteria for catastrophic impairment with respect to mental and behavioural functioning as defined by the Ontario Statutory Accident Benefit Schedule (the "SABS") in s. 2(1.1)(g). It reviews the relevant areas of the SABS, along with key arbitrations and court rulings. This article also explores Designated Assessment Centre ("DAC") guidelines and conventions as applied...