Research misconduct is defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, reviewing research, reporting research results (Anderson, 2013; Breen, 2016; Resnik, 2019). It can occur at many stages of the process. These include during proposal preparation, data collection, analysis and publication (Amin et al., 2012). The previous studies reported that 2,047 articles wer...

R esearch integrity and a corollary scientific misconduct have received increasing attention in the literature in the last three decades. Most of the research conducted on scientific misconduct has been focused on principal investigators (PIs) and other scientists involved in the research enterprise. By virtue of their position, research coordinators (RCs), many of whom are nurses, are often cl...

Discussion is the exchange of arguments and views related to a particular subject discussion making judgments arising from such confrontation. Such content has its place in scientific research report behind results, ahead conclusions. This section own structure, which depends on authors who propose practice it. Regardless variant structure you use, researchers should be aware structures follow ...