Let A(ω) be the class of analytic functions of the form: f(z) = (z − ω) + ∞ ∑ k=2 ak(z − ω) defined on the open unit disk U = {z : |z| < 1} normalized with f(ω) = 0, f ′(ω)−1 = 0 and ω is an arbitrary fixed point in U. In this paper, we define a subclass of ω − α − uniform starlike and convex functions by using a more generalized form of Ruschewey derivative operator. Several properties such as...

An interesting criterion was given by Tuneski [N. Tuneski, On the quotient of the representations of convexity and starlikeness, Math. Nachr. 248–249 (2003) 200–203] for the analytic functions to be in the class S 1⁄21þAz 1þBz and its subclasses, where 1 6 B < A 6 1. This result is an extension of an earlier result of Silverman [H. Silverman, Convex and starlike criteria, Int. Math. Math. Sci. ...

Inclusion relations for k−uniformly starlike functions under the Dziok-Srivastava operator are established. These results are also extended to k−uniformly convex functions, close-to-convex, and quasi-convex functions.

It is clear that 0∈ h(Δ). Moreover, (i) if 0 ∈ h(Δ), then h is called spirallike (resp., starlike) with respect to an interior point; (ii) if 0 ∈ h(Δ), then h is called spirallike (resp., starlike) with respect to a boundary point. In this case, there is a boundary point (say, z = 1) such that h(1) := ∠ limz→1h(z)= 0 (see, e.g., [1, 6]); by symbol∠ lim, we denote the angular (nontangential) lim...

in this paper we introduce and investigate a certain subclass of univalentfunctions which are analytic in the unit disk u.such results as coecientinequalities. the results presented here would provide extensions of those givenin earlier works.