in this paper we introduce the notions of g∗l-module and g∗l-module whichare two proper generalizations of δ-lifting modules. we give some characteriza tions and properties of these modules. we show that a g∗l-module decomposesinto a semisimple submodule m1 and a submodule m2 of m such that every non-zero submodule of m2 contains a non-zero δ-cosingular submodule.

During this search all rings are commutative and modules unitary. In we introduced the concept of Restrict Nearly semi-prime Sub-modules as generalization give some basic properties, examples charactarizations concepts stablished sufficient conditions on to be

A right Johns ring is a Noetherian in which every ideal annihilator. It known that RR the Jacobson radical J(R)J(R) of nilpotent and Soc(R)(R) an essential RR. Moreover, Kasch, is, simple RR-module can be embedded For M∈RM∈R-Mod we use concept MM-annihilator define module (resp. quasi-Johns) as MM such submodule MM-annihilator. called quasi-Johns if any set submodules satisfies ascending chain ...

Let $p$ be a prime, let $K$ discretely valued extension of $\mathbb{Q}_p$, and $A_{K}$ an abelian $K$-variety with semistable reduction. Extending work by Kim Marshall from the case where $p>2$ $K/\mathbb{Q}_p$ is unramified, we prove $l=p$ complement Galois cohomological formula Grothendieck for $l$-primary part N\'eron component group $A_{K}$. Our proof involves constructing, each $m\in \math...

In this paper, all rings are associative with identity and all modules are unital left modules unless otherwise specified. Let R be a ring and M a module. N ≤M will mean N is a submodule of M. A submodule E of M is called essential in M (notation E ≤e M) if E∩A = 0 for any nonzero submodule A of M. Dually, a submodule S of M is called small in M (notation S M) if M = S+T for any proper submodul...

In this paper we introduce the notions of G∗L-module and G∗L-module whichare two proper generalizations of δ-lifting modules. We give some characteriza tions and properties of these modules. We show that a G∗L-module decomposesinto a semisimple submodule M1 and a submodule M2 of M such that every non-zero submodule of M2 contains a non-zero δ-cosingular submodule.

a module m is called epi-retractable if every submodule of m is a homomorphic image of m. dually, a module m is called co-epi-retractable if it contains a copy of each of its factor modules. in special case, a ring r is called co-pli (resp. co-pri) if rr (resp. rr) is co-epi-retractable. it is proved that if r is a left principal right duo ring, then every left ideal of r is an epi-retractable ...

Let R be a commutative ring with identity and let M be a torsion free R-module. Several characterizations of distributive modules are investigated. Indeed, among other equivalent conditions, we prove that M is distributive if and only if any primal submodule of M is irreducible, and, if and only if each submodule of M can be represented as an intersection of irreducible isolated components. MSC...