Abstract In the current debate on lying-misleading distinction, many theorists distinguish between lying as insincere assertion and misleading through conveying an untruthful implicature. There is growing empirical evidence that average speakers count implicatures cases of lying. What matters for them (degree) commitment to Since conversational may arise with non-assertions, presuppositions are...

although studies on pragmatics in general and politeness in particular abound in the literature, impoliteness has been largely ignored. in the present study, participants filled out either the persian or english version of a discourse completion test (dct). the researchers analyzed collected answers to discover the relationship between impoliteness and power. furthermore, the researchers compar...

This special issue of Fundamenta Informaticae is dedicated to papers related to the two workshops on “Logic for Pragmatics” held at the Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Verona, Italy, on September 1-5, 2003, and at LACL, Université de Paris 12, Créteil, France, on July 23-24, 2004. The following note outlines the main ideas of the “Logic for Pragmatics” discussed at those workshops an...

Recapitulation of Lecture 1 Aim of semantics and pragmatics: to give us a theory of linguistic meaning. Semantics: literal non-situation specific meaning of words + the meaning of the way words are combined = the starting point from which the whole meaning of utterance is constructed. Pragmatics: the meaning the speaker intends to communicate in a particular utterance. One of the questions sema...

Constraint-based approaches to pragmatics have customarily focused on the hearer, and offered accounts of the optimal interpretation of utterances. Blutner (2006, i.a.) has argued that it is necessary also to consider the role of the speaker, and thus motivates a bidirectional Optimality Theory (OT) approach to pragmatics. However, as he notes, this may have limited explanatory potential from a...