Can life be an injury? Jurists, theologians, and philosophers have spilled much ink over this question. Wrongful birth and wrongful life lawsuits are frequently debated in courts and academic circles. In broad overview, wrongful birth lawsuits are prenatal negligence suits brought by the parents of a deformed or retarded child against a doctor who negligently failed to diagnose or inform the pa...

Islamic financial jurisprudence has always had the stated aim of enhancing human welfare, and therefore prohibitions must be seen through the lens of welfare-enhancing regulation of financial practices. In today’s age of financial engineering, utilizing many of the legal and financial advances of the past two decades, it is quite easy to synthesize the contracts that classical and contemporary ...

The standard history of antihomosexual legislation states that lesbian acts were not punished by medieval or later laws. This essay challenges this view by documenting capital laws since 1270 in Europe and America. A major influence was Paul's condemnation in Romans I, 26. By 1400, the lex foedissimam, an edict of the Emperors Diocletian and Maximianus, issued in 287, was interpreted to justify...

in islamic jurisprudence, juridical disagreement means dispute between islamic jurists to confirm a comment or proscribe another. disagreement is arising from contradict reasons or jurist concepts. whether concern other concepts is necessary or not, is a contradict matter. in the shafi'ite's jurist opinion avoidance from diversity is recommended for all jurists and followers. it means...

This study delves into the nuanced understanding of human dignity as expressed and upheld within framework Shi’i Islam. Drawing on Quran primary source interpretation law rights, this research investigates portrayal in Shia tradition through Islamic revelation. Furthermore, illuminates how certain scholars depict striving for coherence diverse religions cultures Imams have contributed to discou...

One so-called paradox of blackmail concerns the fact that "two legal whites together make a black." That is, it is licit to threaten to reveal a person's secret, and it is separately lawful to ask him for money; but when both are undertaken at once, together, this act is called blackmail and is prohibited A second so-called paradox is that if the blackmailer initiates the act, this is seen by j...

Islamic financial jurisprudence has always had the stated aim of enhancing human welfare, and therefore prohibitions must be seen through the lens of welfare-enhancing regulation of financial practices. In today’s age of financial engineering, utilizing many of the legal and financial advances of the past two decades, it is quite easy to synthesize the contracts that classical and contemporary ...

The physician's acquittal has obsessed Iranian legislator's mind to a large extent. This is exclusively observed in Iranian statuses and specifically in Shi'ite school of though. Muslim jurists' opinions play a very important role in enacting legal articles related to it. After reviewing the literature, the authors tried to pick and collect common features of physician's responsibilities and du...

Beginning in the late nineteenth century, the question of whether concubinage violated the principle of monogamy arose in legal and public debates. Late imperial views of the concubine as a minor wife continued to influence popular views of the concubine in the Republic, leading many to condemn concubinage as bigamy. Hoping to circumvent the monogamy issue, Republican jurists who wished to cont...

From the analysis of a research project supported by government funding currently in progress in Italy, a few criteria of describing legal information on different levels are presented. The non-jurists users, who the public nature of the project regards as privileged, are not able to explain clearly the information they need, therefore particular attention should be paid to the description of t...