In 2011, the United States Supreme Court in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. struck down a Vermont law that would restrict the ability of pharmaceutical companies to purchase certain physician-identifiable prescription data without the consent of the prescriber. The law's stated purpose was threefold: to protect the privacy of medical information, to protect the public health and to contain healthcar...

M GM’s media blitz has given the impression that the entertainment industry won an overwhelming and broad victory against peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing and file-sharing technologies when the Supreme Court announced its decision in the MGM v. Grokster at the end of June. MGM can, of course, point to the 9-0 vote that vacated the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision that Grokster could not ...

In the past, litigation process in court was carried out manually from registration of cases to reading court’ decision. With promulgation Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 2019 concerning Administration Cases and Hearing Electronic Courts (PERMA 2019), paradigm regarding judiciary has shifted towards electronic justice. sense that cases, adjudication stage (trial court) decisions is electronicall...

Good-government reform proposals like those offered by Professors Craig Lerner and Nelson Lund generally confront several difficulties. Details matter, but most reform proposals are understandably sketchy.1 The details ordinarily would be fleshed out as the proposal works its way through the process of enactment, but this process is difficult to navigate. The politics of good-government reforms...

In this study, machinability tests on Assab Korkmaz Orvar Supreme (1.2344 ESR, AISI H13 Premium) hot work tool steel widely used in industry were carried out. Machinability tests were carried out through single point turning method at eight different cutting speeds (120, 160, 200, 240, 280, 320, 360 ve 400 m/dak), four different feed rates (0,05; 0,10; 0,15 and 0,20 mm/min) and 1 mm depth of cu...

The 1973 case Nelson v. Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson established the legality of abortion [3] in Arizona. The Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that the Arizona Revised Statutes 13-211, 13-212, and 13-213, collectively called the Arizona abortion [3] statutes, were unconstitutional. The statutes had made illegal receiving, providing, or advertising abortions. After the Arizona Appeals Court...

Two important legal reforms in court procedure have taken place in Brazil recently: súmula vinculante (all courts now have to follow the reasoning of the Supreme Court in similar cases) and requisito da repercussão geral (the Supreme Court only hears cases that are of general importance). These two procedural rules respond to a long debate in the Brazilian legal community on how to address cour...

I argue the Supreme Court learns to craft legal rules by relying on the Courts of Appeals as laboratories of law, observing their decisions and reviewing those that best inform legal development. I develop a model that shows how the Supreme Court leverages multiple Courts of Appeals decisions to identify which will be most informative to review, and what decision to make upon review. Because an...