Abstract Artificially intelligent systems will be used to make increasingly important decisions about us. Many of these have made without universal agreement the relevant moral facts. For other kinds disagreement, it is at least usually obvious what kind solution called for. What makes disagreement especially challenging that there are three different ways handling it. Moral solutions apply a t...

We posit that consumers form expectations about inflation by combining two sources of information: their beliefs from shopping experience and news they learn experts. Disagreement among in our model comes four sources: (i) consumers’ divergent prior beliefs, (ii) heterogeneity propensities to experts, (iii) experts’ different views future inflation, (iv) difference mean between By carefully mat...

In the peer disagreement debate, three intuitively attractive claims seem to conflict: there is among peers on many important matters; a serious challenge one's own opinion; and yet one should be able maintain opinion matters. This article shows that contrary initial appearances, we can accept all of these claims. Disagreement significantly shifts balance evidence; but with respect certain kind...

Abstract It is common to distinguish between disagreement in the state sense (being disagreement) and activity (having a disagreement). This paper deals with question of what it for two people have disagreement. First, I present reject thesis according which having matter expressing conflicting attitudes. argue that this not sufficient disagreement: can express attitudes without Second, involve...