Š + Z s x Z v ¬ \ » W y ~ x ì 7 g ~ ¬ Ý Z K̈ +M Å @ Z e$ Ô Z & b z # b Z z g ] Æ n W c* ì X Z s x Z q§ ] 6, z g Š + ì ) 1 ( å Ÿ $ î E 0 § ] Z z g Z qY ì Š 2 g ) 2 ( ì X Z v ¬ \ ä Ñ < * i w Û â ð ì Z k ~ t & ¢A g ¿ ì z { CÙ q w ~ Š * Å g É ð TM n Ô Z z g CÙ 2 w ~ p | ] · Z v m z Å Z v ¬ \ Æ W y ~ g Î w X Æ Š Z ], { t ] Ã 5+ k, Z K̈ +M » ‚ B Š } n Z z g CÙ i â y z k y 6, ” Z z g Z $+ Z Ñ !...

Ú ̆ ‰ ‡ Ï , È Â ‡ · was an active, if not the most active, character throughout „ Â „ ’s reign. However, the character of È Â ‡ · and his brothers is foggy and puzzling. Although many of us have been taught to classify figures in Tanach into the roles of either ¢ ˆ „ È ̃ ¢ or ¢ ̄ ̆ Ú ¢ to further our understanding of the manifest context © Ù ̆ Ë ® and latent meaning © „ ̄ ̆ ® of the text, È Â ‡ · and ...