So, what’s the verdict, good or bad? Boring algae clearly have important functions in reef ecosystems and will influence how they cope with climate change and ocean acidification in the near future. However, we cannot yet give a verdict as to whether they will act as a buffer against these environmental changes or make the situation worse. Little is known about the ecophysiological diversity of...

At any level of computer networks, interoperability testing generally deals with several components that communicate while trying to provide a designated service. When a component remains silent, the assigned testing verdict is generally Fail, assuming that its behavior is non-conformant. Sometimes, this silence may be anticipated given the component’s specifications. In these cases, the fail v...

I commend John Melville and David Naimark for their commentary in this issue of the Journal demonstrating how the guilty but mentally ill (GBMI) verdict perverts the insanity defense by encouraging jurors to find insane defendants guilty (but mentally ill) and by imposing punishment on those found GBMI that is more severe than would have been imposed on them if they had simply been found guilty...

To the Editor: Cocaine is one of the most widespread drugs of abuse; therefore, clinical laboratories are frequently requested to screen for the presence of cocaine and its metabolites in urine. When screening a urine specimen from a potential study participant for drugs of abuse, using a Verdict II lateral flow test slide (MEDTOX Diagnostics), multiple technologists obtained a negative screeni...

Black and White mock jurors' sensitivity to the cross-race effect was investigated by varying the race of the eyewitness in a simulated murder trial of a Black defendant. Participants heard an audiotape of a trial after which they rendered a verdict and rated the credibility of the witnesses. White participants found the prosecution witnesses (including the eyewitness) more credible, and the de...

This article provides commentary on Saul Rosenzweig’s classic 1936 paper, “Some Implicit Common Factors in Diverse Methods of Psychotherapy,” with particular emphasis on his clever and prophetic invocation of the dodo bird verdict from Alice in Wonderland. The impact of this seminal contribution is discussed by a comparison of Rosenzweig’s original common factors proposal with modern formulatio...

In a homogeneous jury, in which each vote is correct with the same probability, and each pair of votes correlates with the same correlation coefficient, there exists a correlation-robust voting quota, such that the probability of a correct verdict is independent of the correlation coefficient. For positive correlation, an increase in the correlation coefficient decreases the probability of a co...

The paper aims at contrasting two ends of the spectrum regarding controversial Ayodhya Verdict while carefully pondering on points distinction between legal scholars Upendra Baxi and A.G Noorani