The rise of the social web and its uptake by scholars has led to the creation of altmetrics, which are social web metrics for academic publications. These new metrics can, in theory, be used in an evaluative role, to give early estimates of the impact of publications or to give estimates of non-traditional types of impact. They can also be used as an information seeking aid: to help draw a digi...

Wikipedia authors cite external references to support claims made in their articles in order to increase their validity. A large number of claims, however, do not have supporting citations, putting them in question. In this paper, we describe a study in which we attempt to retrieve relevant citations for claims using a variety of information retrieval algorithms. These algorithms are inspired b...

We examined the correlations between an article’s citation count (as an indicator of the article’s quality) and different impact measures regarding the article’s references (as indicators of the quality of the authors’ information seeking while producing the article). Two research questions of interest were studied. First, do authors’ information seeking and use affect the quality of their rese...

As universities have entered a time of increased demand for public outreach and measurable impact, the universities are also exploring social media for student recruitment and science communication. Because many of the popular social media sites are free to use they could provide more democratic channels for organizational communication and marketing efforts. This research in progress investiga...

Demonstrating scholarly impact is a matter of growing importance. This paper reports on a bibliometric and altmetric analysis conducted on the Journal of Community Informatics (JOCI). Besides the bibliometric analysis the study also looked into JOCI article-level metrics by comparing usage metrics (article views), alternative metrics (Mendeley readership), and traditional citation metrics (Goog...

In theory, articles can attract readers in the social reference sharing site Mendeley before they can attract citations and so Mendeley altmetrics could provide early indications of article impact. This article investigates the influence of time on the number of Mendeley readers of an article through a theoretical discussion and an investigation into the relationship between counts of readers o...

A set of 12436 papers published in 20 GIScience journals in the period 2000–2014 were analysed to extract publication patterns and trends. This comprehensive scientometric study focuses on multiple aspects: output volume, citations, national output and efficiency (output adjusted with econometric indicators), collaboration, altmetrics (Altmetric score, Twitter mentions, and Mendeley bookmarking...

INTRODUCTION Altmetric indicators, defined as mentions from social media platforms to scientific literature, are seen as promising and with the potential to be used, when fully developed in research evaluation (Wilsdon et al., 2015). They are perceived as a means to connect with ‘broader audiences’ translating research findings from academia to society. Despite this enthusiastic appraisal on wh...

Introduction Twitter is increasingly accepted as a venue to consume and disseminate information (Gruzd et al., 2012) and is used by scholars to share information about (a) professional discussions, (b) network with others, (c) offer help/request help, (d) call attention to other social media involvement, (e) personal discussions, and (f) impression management (Veletsianos, 2012). It is also see...

Altmetrics from Altmetric.com are widely used by publishers and researchers to give earlier evidence of attention than citation counts. This article assesses whether Altmetric.com scores are reliable early indicators of likely future impact and whether they may also reflect non-scholarly impacts. A preliminary factor analysis suggests that the main altmetric indicator of scholarly impact is Men...