Take down policy If you believe this document infringes copyright, raise a complaint by contacting [email protected]. The document will be immediately withdrawn from public access while the complaint is being investigated.

This paper describes approach and evaluation using CRFs and dictionary matching in Task1 (Extraction of complaint and diagnosis Task) and dictionary matching in Task2 (Normalization of complaint and diagnosis Task). Team name Uni2014 Subtasks ・Task1 (Extraction Task) ・Task2 (Normalization Task)

OBJECTIVE The risk of being disciplined in connection with a complaint case causes distress to most general practitioners. The present study examined the characteristics of complaint cases resulting in disciplinary action. MATERIAL AND METHODS The Danish Patients' Complaints Board's decisions concerning general practice in 2007 were examined. Information on the motives for complaining, as wel...

OBJECTIVE To describe complaints by patients and compare rates of complaint in demographic subgroups of patients and hospital departments. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective analysis of complaints made by patients attending 67 hospitals (metropolitan, 25; rural, 42) in Victoria, and lodged with the Victorian Health Complaint Information Program (January 1997 - December 2001). MAIN OUTCOME MEA...