The Commission on the Nomenclature of Biological Chemistry decided in 1958 that an attempt should be made to standardize the abbreviations and symbols used for chemical names of special interest in biological chemistry. A Subcommittee, consisting of L. Hellerman, W. Klyne (Chairman), and E. C. Slater, was set up early in 1959 to deal with this problem. The original draft proposals were based on...

To develop this certification program, Joint Commission staff convened a perinatal care technical advisory panel of clinical experts for guidance on creating requirements for the evaluation of organizations seeking perinatal care certification. Field reviews, learning visits, and pilot surveys also helped staff learn the current state of perinatal care services, determine the concepts or proces...

BACKGROUND Evaluations of the impact of hospital accreditation have been previously hampered by the lack of nationally standardized data. One way to assess this impact is to compare accreditation status with other evidence-based measures of quality, such as the process measures now publicly reported by The Joint Commission and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). OBJECTIVES T...

The Commission on the Nomenclature of Biological Chemistry decided in 1958 that an attempt should be made to standardize the abbreviations and symbols used for chemical names of special interest in biological chemistry. A Subcommittee, consisting of L. Hellerman, W. Klyne (Chairman), and E. C. Slater, was set up early in 1959 to deal with this problem. The original draft proposals were based on...

The Commission on the Nomenclature of Biological Chemistry decided in 1958 that an attempt should be made to standardize the abbreviations and symbols used for chemical names of special interest in biological chemistry. A Subcommittee, consisting of L. Hellerman, W. Klyne (Chairman), and E. C. Slater, was set up early in 1959 to deal with this problem. The original draft proposals were based on...

The Commission on the Nomenclature of Biological Chemistry decided in 1958 that an attempt should be made to standardize the abbreviations and symbols used for chemical names of special interest in biological chemistry. A Subcommittee, consisting of L. Hellerman, W. Klyne (Chairman), and E. C. Slater, was set up early in 1959 to deal with this problem. The original draft proposals were based on...

The Commission on the Nomenclature of Biological Chemistry decided in 1958 that an attempt should be made to standardize the abbreviations and symbols used for chemical names of special interest in biological chemistry. A Subcommittee, consisting of L. Hellerman, W. Klyne (Chairman), and E. C. Slater, was set up early in 1959 to deal with this problem. The original draft proposals were based on...

The Commission on the Nomenclature of Biological Chemistry decided in 1958 that an attempt should be made to standardize the abbreviations and symbols used for chemical names of special interest in biological chemistry. A Subcommittee, consisting of L. Hellerman, W. Klyne (Chairman), and E. C. Slater, was set up early in 1959 to deal with this problem. The original draft proposals were based on...

The Commission on the Nomenclature of Biological Chemistry decided in 1958 that an attempt should be made to standardize the abbreviations and symbols used for chemical names of special interest in biological chemistry. A Subcommittee, consisting of L. Hellerman, W. Klyne (Chairman), and E. C. Slater, was set up early in 1959 to deal with this problem. The original draft proposals were based on...

The Commission on the Nomenclature of Biological Chemistry decided in 1958 that an attempt should be made to standardize the abbreviations and symbols used for chemical names of special interest in biological chemistry. A Subcommittee, consisting of L. Hellerman, W. Klyne (Chairman), and E. C. Slater, was set up early in 1959 to deal with this problem. The original draft proposals were based on...