نتایج جستجو برای: multiformalismmodeling framework mfmf

تعداد نتایج: 462147  

2009
Tony McBryan Philip D. Gray

This paper describes an approach to user configuration of activity awareness. This approach offers users increased flexibility by allowing the use of multiple methods of configuration to be used within a unified framework; these configuration methods can include context, policy rules and automatic techniques of configuring behaviour. In this paper we describe the benefits of this flexibility an...

2006
M. Hofmann T. Streicher

However, the implication from (1) to (2) is equivalent to the principle of dependent choices (as the reader can show for himself) and cannot be proved in ZF. A relation < on X is called well-founded if any of these statements holds. Intuitionistically, the three statements are far from equivalent (hence, in formalizing an intuitionistic notion of well-foundedness, care is needed). Notion (1) is...

Journal: :Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 2018
Sylwia Polberg Anthony Hunter

In dialogical argumentation, it is often assumed that the involved parties will always correctly identify the intended statements posited by each other and realize all of the associated relations, conform to the three acceptability states (accepted, rejected, undecided), adjust their views whenever new and correct information comes in, and that a framework handling only attack relations is suff...

2000
Paulo Alencar Donald D. Cowan Sérgio Crespo Marcus Felipe Fontoura Carlos José Lucena

This position paper describes our work in application frameworks. Some questions for discussion are also stated and we try to answer them based on either our theoretical studies or our previous experience. Our major research topics are also presented as relevant points to be discussed in the workshop.

2009
Dan Cartwright Katie Atkinson Trevor Bench-Capon

Methods of argument representation can be exploited in systems for edemocracy. In this paper we discuss a particular method of argument representation, known as an argumentation scheme, and some issues concerning the relations between arguments represented using such schemes. We show how this method of argument representation has been implemented in a practical system designed for the public to...

1997
Haim Judah Andrzej Roslanowski

The aim of this paper is to present a detailed explanation of three models of Shelah. We show the rule of the amalgamation in the construction of models in which all deenable sets of reals have Baire property or are Lebesgue measurable. Next we construct a model in which every projective set of reals has Baire property, a model with the Uniformization Property and a model of ZF + DC in which al...

2011
Leila Amgoud Srdjan Vesic

In this paper, we show that preferences intervene twice in argumentation frameworks: i) to compute standard solutions (i.e. extensions), and ii) to refine those solutions (i.e. to return only the preferred extensions). The two roles are independent and obey to distinct postulates. After introducing and studying the postulates, we provide an example of a formal framework which models the two rol...

2007
Adam Zachary Wyner Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon Katie Atkinson

In this paper, we model a recent legal case as presented in a court of first instance using argument schemes and an argumentation framework, providing a formal analysis of the case and how the outcome was determined. The paper contributes to the body of literature that formally analyses legal cases in terms of arguments and argument schemes. It is novel in that we analyse a case in a court of f...

نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال

با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید