Historically, analytic philosophy has not been as close to psychiatry as the continental tradition. For instance, no analytic philosopher has produced a treatise as important and comprehensive as Karl Jaspers’s General Psychopathology (Jaspers 1963 [1913]), a work deeply infl uenced by phenomenology. Similarly, no analytic philosopher so far has critically engaged with the practice and history ...

Philosophy is often divided into two traditions: analytic and continental philosophy. Characterizing the analytic-continental divide, however, no easy task. Some philosophers explain divide in terms of place argument these traditions. This raises following questions: Is philosophy rife with arguments while devoid arguments? Or can different types be found philosophy? paper presents results an e...

There has recently been a plethora of attempts to understand the key differences that separate the analytic and continental traditions of philosophy, often involving either painstaking descriptions of the divergent argumentative techniques and methodologies that concern them, or comparatively examining in detail the work of certain major theorists in both traditions (e.g. Rawls and Derrida, Lew...

In a 1978 lecture in Tokyo, Foucault drew comparison between his own philosophical methodology and that of ‘Anglo-Saxon analytic philosophy’, claiming the label ‘analytic philosophy politics’ for approach. This may seem like somewhat surprising given gulf contemporary continental philosophy, but I argue it is very productive one which indeed might help us reconsider this gulf. proceed through s...

Analytic philosophers have until recently heen reluctant to investigate the complex historical roolc; of their own philosophical tradition. Slowly, but surely, however, the necessary work is being done, and it is interesting in this respect that not only the Anglo-Saxon hut also the Continental roots of analytic philosophy are heing usefully illuminated .2 For as Michael Dummett points out in h...