objectives: bone quality and quantity assessment is one of the most important steps in implant treatment planning. different methods such as computed tomography (ct) and recently suggested cone beam computed tomography (cbct) with lower radiation dose and less time and cost are used for bone density assessment. this in vitro study aimed to compare the tissue density values in hounsfield units (...

introduction: computed tomography (ct) and cone-beam ct (cbct) are valuable diagnostic aids for many clinical applications. this study was designed to compare the gray scale value (gsv) and hounsfield unit (hu) of selected dental materials and various hard tissues using ct or cbct. methods and materials: three samples of all test materials including amalgam (am), composite resin (cr), glass ion...

conclusions ultrasound is recommended as the first choice when fb is located within the superficial soft tissues with no bone around it. in case of penetration of fb into deeper tissues or beneath bone, ct or cbct are recommended. otherwise, considering lower dose, cbct is preferred over ct. we can use mri if the fb is not ferromagnetic. however, ct is the first choice in emergency situations b...