Preventive measures represent a type of coercive procedural through which the authority’s judicial systems attempt to restrict defendant's freedom movement ensure that trials criminal proceedings are carried out accordingly. From this point view, preventive reach their goal objective by interfering with individual liberty minimum necessary or his deprivation for certain period time. The use bai...

Parliamentary procedures are undoubtedly at the heart of (national) parliamentary sovereignty. However, in last two decades, courts, including supranational ones (e.g. ECtHR), increasingly getting involved assessing application rules and procedures. This increasing judicial activism highlights importance finding equilibrium between right to an effective remedy, which inevitably should encompass...

one of important subjects in the civil procedure is the dispute in competence of judicial authorities. the title of chapter 2 of part1 of the civil procedure code, enacted by 1379 (articles 26-30) is the dispute in competence and method of settlement of it. there is no different between inherent and local competence in this chapter. moreover, there are not regulations about relative competence ...

It has been argued that procedural formalism undermines economic efficiency by fostering rent-seeking and corruption. We challenge this view by arguing that a number of judicial procedures foster economic growth by increasing the predictability of court decisions, which leads to more transactions and higher investment levels. We investigate the effects on economic growth of 15 judicial procedur...

Background: Retrial is an additional combination of the words "retrial" and "trial". Trial is a means of justice and trial, like others, is in the introduction of error and error if there is a verdict that is accompanied by error as a result of the trial. Which must be reconsidered. In the relations between taxpayers and the tax system, a dispute is possible, which can be due to factors such as...

Abstract: In this article, I review the decisions of the appellate courts in National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) cases over a twenty year period, 1994 to 2014, to ascertain what political, economic and legal factors impact judicial decision making. Unlike many other analyses of appellate decision making, this study makes a deliberate effort to take into account legal and procedural differen...