Waste from tea, a beverage globally consumed is a common menace discarded to the environment thereby contributing to environmental pollution. The textile and paper industries have also been major culprits in the pollution of the environment through their indiscriminate discharge of dye solutions. These dyes are carcinogenic, mutagenic, and generally harmful to the entire eco-system; this has po...

The state of Punjab is facing a major threat ecological, agrarian as well emerging health crisis. Continuously depleting water tables due to unregulated use irrigation and increased cultivation water-thirsty, varieties rice are posing availability in the state. Indiscriminate chemicals farming leading soil infertility, polluted surface waters air pollution contributing ecological catastrophe ev...

The indiscriminate discharge of ballast water into the aquatic environment could bioaccumulate in food chain and pose serious problems for animal human health. Biological monitoring involving use organisms provides good indication environmental pollution by toxic materials wastewaters. In this study, Clarias gariepinus juveniles were exposed to different concentrations under laboratory conditio...

Evidence that gene×environment interactions can reflect differential sensitivity to the environmental context, rather than risk or resilience, is increasing. To test this model, we examined the genetic contribution to indiscriminate social behavior, in the setting of a randomized controlled trial of foster care compared to institutional rearing. Children enrolled in the Bucharest Early Interven...

OBJECTIVE This study included 54-month-old children with a history of institutional care. Our goal was to: (1) examine differences in indiscriminate social behaviors in children with a history of institutional care compared with home-reared children; (2) test whether foster care reduces indiscriminate social behaviors in a randomized controlled trial; and (3) examine early predictors of indiscr...

Erard on Kim et al. ..............................564 Kim et al. reply ....................................564 LoSchiavo & Shatz on Arnett .............565 Webster et al. on Arnett ......................566 Stroebe & Nijstad on Arnett ...............569 Haeffel et al. on Arnett ........................570 Arnett replies ........................................571 Boatright-Horowitz & Soeung on ...