Abstract An old question in Spinoza scholarship is how finite, non-eternal things transitively caused by other (i. e., the entities described propositions like E 1p28) are infinite, eternal substance, given that what follows either directly or indirectly from divine nature infinite and ( 1p21–23). In “Spinoza’s Monism I,”<fnote>“Spinoza’s I,” previous issue of this journal.</fnote> ...

Abstract I argue that Nietzsche puts forward a pandispositionalist view can be seen as the conjunction of two basic claims: powers are constituents reality, on one hand, and only properties things possess relational qua dispositional, other hand. As believe such is, at least in part, motivated by his rejection Kant’s notion themselves, start sketching metaphysics transcendental idealism (sectio...