Note. The determinant of a circulant matrix is an example of a group determinant, where the group is the cyclic group of order n. In 1880 Dedekind suggested generalizing the case of circulants (and more generally group de­ terminants for abelian groups) to arbitrary groups. It was this suggestion that led Frobenius to the creation group of representation theory. See [1] and the references therein.

The main result of this paper is a generalization the theorem Chevalley-Shephard-Todd to rings invariants pseudoreflection groups over Dedekind domains. In special case principal ideal domain in which group order invertible it proved that ring isomorphic polynomial ring. An intermediate every finitely generated regular graded algebra tensor product blowup algebras.

The aim of this paper is to construct new Dedekind type sums. We construct generating functions of Barnes’ type multiple FrobeniusEuler numbers and polynomials. By applying Mellin transformation to these functions, we define Barnes’ type multiple l-functions, which interpolate Frobenius-Euler numbers at negative integers. By using generalizations of the Frobenius-Euler functions, we define gene...

Unlike the uniform completion, the Dedekind completion of a vector lattice is not functorial. In order to repair the lack of functoriality of Dedekind completions, we enrich the signature of vector lattices with a proximity relation, thus arriving at the category pdv of proximity Dedekind vector lattices. We prove that the Dedekind completion induces a functor from the category bav of bounded a...

Invertibility of multiplication modules All rings are commutative with 1 and all modules are unital. Let R be a ring and M an R-module. M is called multiplication if for each submodule N of M, N=IM for some ideal I of R. Multiplication modules have recently received considerable attention during the last twenty years. In this talk we give the de nition of invertible submodules as a natural gene...

We study sums of the form ∑ ζ R(ζ), where R is a rational function and the sum is over all nth roots of unity ζ (often with ζ = 1 excluded). We call these generalized Dedekind sums, since the most well-known sums of this form are Dedekind sums. We discuss three methods for evaluating such sums: The method of factorization applies if we have an explicit formula for ∏ ζ(1− xR(ζ)). Multisection ca...

We show that a Dedekind-finite, semi-π-regular ring with a “nice” topology is an א0-exchange ring, and the same holds true for a strongly clean ring with a “nice” topology. We generalize the argument to show that a Dedekind-finite, semi-regular ring with a “nice” topology is a full exchange ring. Putting these results in the language of modules, we show that a cohopfian module with finite excha...

It is well-known that, given a Dedekind categoryR the category of (typed) matrices with coefficients from R is a Dedekind category with arbitrary relational sums. In this paper we show that under slightly stronger assumptions the converse is also true. Every atomic Dedekind category R with relational sums and subobjects is equivalent to a category of matrices over a suitable basis. This basis i...