The issuance of the latest Constitutional Court Law, Law Number 7 2020 on Third Amendment to 24 2003 Court, does not bring significant changes in mechanism for monitoring constitutional court justices and enforcement Code Ethics Conduct Justices. This paper aimed offer a more holistic means supervising judges. idea is triangle supervision consisting internal control individual judges, instituti...

would finally overrule Miranda v. Arizona. After all, beginning in the 1970s, the Justices had gradually narrowed Miranda's reach, and Berkemer seemed to present an enticing opportunity to remove it from the books altogether! That step the Justices did not take. Writing for a unanimous Court,4 Justice Marshall may have held against the defendant, but his opinion reaffirmed a "central principle"...

We construct demographic models of retirement and death in office of U.S. Supreme Court justices, a group that has gained demographic notice, evaded demographic analysis, and is said to diverge from expected retirement patterns. Models build on prior multistate labor force status studies, and data permit an unusually clear distinction between voluntary and "induced" retirement. Using data on ev...

According to attitudinal theorists, justices on the U. S. Supreme Court decide cases largely on political preferences that fall within one dimension of ideology. The focus of this study is to test whether a unidimensional ideological model explains the voting behavior of Canadian Supreme Court justices (1992-1997). The factor analysis results in three areas of law, two of which have never been ...

Popular reactions to the transition from centrally planned socialism to a market-based economy are explored through an examination of survey data on distributive justice and injustice attitudes in Beijing, China, in 2000, and in Warsaw, Poland, in 2001. In both capitals objective socioeconomic status characteristics of respondents have weaker and less consistent associations with distributive i...

Conventional arguments identify either the median justice or the opinion author as the most influential justices in shaping the content of Supreme Court opinions. We develop a model of judicial decision making that suggests that opinions are likely to reflect the views of the median justice in the majority coalition. This result derives from two features of judicial decision making that have re...

Every year since 1957, the Harvard Law Review has published a matrix of the voting patterns of the previous Supreme Court term (Harvard Law Review, 1957). This matrix includes how often two justices vote together in cases as well as the total number of possible cases that any two justices could have voted together. From this tabular data it is possible to derive the normalized frequency with wh...