Background: Responsibility is a moral component. Liability usually arises from liability, according to which the person is legally liable for the damage he or she has caused to another. One of the most important parts of civil law is civil liability, and since the main purpose of civil liability rules is to compensate for material and moral damages and to repair the damage, the government is no...

The research aims to analyze civil liability, with a focus related the dissemination of Fake News, checking existence, or not, various damages arising from conduct disseminating false news. In this study, we sought highlight implications mainly regard theme freedom expression, as well legality hypotheses, in Brazilian legal system, culminating Civil Liability. proposed according content analysi...

The work presented aims to analyze the current state of moral damages in collective or diffuse procedures resulting from implementation Law No. 21,081 that reforms Consumer Protection 19,496. We start with a general overview damage, differentiating between individual and interests. Later, we assess modification introduced by article 51 2 Law, which conceptually restructured origin hypothesis: p...

Rather than “selfishness,” a more accurate and revealing interpretation of Wang’s use of siyu is “self-centeredness.” One of the main goals in Wang’s model of moral cultivation was to attain a state devoid of self-centered desires. Wang relied a great deal on the exercise and cultivation of an emotional identification and feeling of oneness with others. In this paper, I first provide a brief su...

Liquidated damages mechanisms have been analyzed from a legal perspective and applied to real-world contracts. Due the lack of application LDs common agency theory, this research explores whether liquidated mechanism can resolve principal–principal conflicts under agency. We combine moral hazard model with non-cooperative dynamic game theory analyze influence on agent principals condition compl...

Among naturalist philosophers, both defenders and opponents of moral relativism argue that prescriptive moral theories (or normative theories) should be constrained by empirical findings about human psychology. Empiricists have asked if people are or can be moral relativists, and what effect being a moral relativist can have on an individual’s moral functioning. This research is underutilized i...