Answer to cond-mat/0106005, cond-mat/0106006 and additional notes are given concerning my previous comment (cond-mat/0105325). Recently I have discussed the numerical results for the Anderson transition [1]. Objections [2] and [3] have appeared after that. We answer here to the arguments of [2, 3] and give the additional comments. 1. First of all, some explanations. Indeed, I used two strong ex...