This research discusses the renewal matters in Islamic jurisprudence by scholars on its origin method. The team of modern have improved to give some new opinions about jurisprudence. major difference among both teams: one wants hold views method and other who way understanding is that: priority first renew reconstruct with respect traditional scholars. In addition, they tried purify from mistak...

Abstract The current crisis in the relationship between Polish Constitutional Court and of Justice European Union (ECJ) is crucial significance for process regional integration based on values liberal democracy taking place EU. constitutional Poland that began end 2015 has challenged systemic position Court. It resulted a new model adjudication, this Court, stripped its counter-majoritarian pow...

principlism, in general and four principles approach in particular is largely discussed in current medical ethics. accord­ing to principlism, the ethical relationship between physician and patient has to be categorized based on some princi­ples, the prin­ciples which are general, action-guiding and could help both the patient and the physician to arrange their ethical behav­ior. four principles...

hearings, according to the general principles, appear in open courts. therefore, confidential and private hearings are exeptional by legal stipulation. this exeption is depicted and stipulated in arbitration. the charactristics of arbitration are being confidential and private. these two are main points for reterring to arbitration. in jurisprudence, the consensus is only on the private aspect ...

abstract the penal legal procedure is a certain mechanism to find out the crime with respect to the behavior of the accused and the guilty. this mechanism must ensure the principles which guarantee justice and fairness, and provide the individual rights and freedoms that are the extreme goal of every just fair legal procedure. so in the proper execution of islamic commands, the necessity of obs...