The ivermectin saga has taken on a new dimension: respect for the rule of law by state. is important, as it cornerstone our democratic Constitutional order. South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) statutory mandate to regulate medicines and related substances, but also constitutional duty obey law. This includes obeying court orders. However, SAHPRA appears have contravened ...

The provisional measures orders by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in Armenia v. Azerbaijan , (2021), and Ukraine Russian Federation (2022) are reproduced here to mark start proceedings these important cases. issued a setting ongoing tensions pending war, respectively.

This case note considers the role of section 48 orders under Mental Capacity Act 2005 following decision by Mostyn J in A Local Authority v LD and RD [2023] EWHC 1258 (Fam). The concerned an application for removal from home a man his 40s with learning disability, autism Down’s Syndrome purposes assessment mental capacity. function interim as well wider problem removing adults their own name sa...

the decisions of the court of justice at any levels of proceeding up to its termination, to some extend indicate the viewpoints of the court and its approach towards the claims and the defenses of the parties to lawsuit. when the trial ends, the court declares its decisive resolution within the framework of a judgment, and in proportion to the type of claim object and the course of trial procee...

hearsay in common law, is a statement made out-of-court and offered in court as evidence to prove the truth of the assertion made in the statement. the hearsay rule states that hearsay is not admissible unless provided by exceptions in the rules of evidence or courts’ precedents. the test for determining hearsay is whether a statement was made out of court and is being offered in order to prove...

the institutions of civil procedure have a special functions and it is necessary that this functions always be observe. two institutions are organize for control of court dictums. appeal court is for control of judgment from fact and law aspect wholly and supreme court is only for law aspect. however in practice we can see that supreme court at same cases control the judgment from fact aspect.i...

considering native modernism existence, iranian constitutional revolution can be contemplated as an exordium for cultural transition because constitutionalism movement played a significant role in transferring modern concepts to iran. this kind of perception about modernism oversees the experimental and practical events, and also provides the opportunity to survey art system shift in the contex...