Launonen and Mullins argue that if Classical Theism is true, human cognition likely not theism-tracking, at least, given what we know from cognitive science of religion. In this essay, develop a model for how classical theists can make sense the findings science, without abandoning their Theist commitments. We also provide an argument our aligns well with Christian doctrine general revelation.

Abstract Enric F. Gel has recently argued that classical theism enjoys a significant advantage over Graham Oppy's naturalism. According to Gel, – unlike naturalism satisfactorily answers two questions: first, how many first causes are there, and second, why is it number rather than another? In this article, I reply Gel's argument for theism's also draw out wider implications of my investigation...

abstract in order to optimum utilization of diazinon on rice stem borer, chilo suppressalis walker (lepidoptera: pyralidae), an experiment was conducted with two factors including, rice varieties (tarom-mahalli, khazar, nemat) and application times (control with no application, first generation application, second generation application, first and second generations application and four times a...