Y o u n g , m i d d l e , a n d o l d e r d r i v e r s w e r e m o t o r e d t o w a r d s a t r a f f i c s i g n a l f a c e a n d w e r e r e q u i r e d t o r e p o r t w h e t h e r t h e i l l u m i n a t e d s i g n a l l e n s w a s m o d u l a t i n g . N o s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s w e r e f o u n d a m o n g t h e t h r e e a g e g r o u p s i n t h e d i s t a n c...

m a c y . ' I n s t e a d , w e s h o u l d a s k " w h i c h b o y s o r g i r l s , w h e r e , w h e n , a n d u n d e r w h a t c i r c u m s t a n c e s . " ( 1 0 8 ) I h a v e a t t e m p t e d t o r e s p o n d t o T h o m e ' s a r g u m e n t s b y i n t e r s e c t i n g g e n d e r a n d a g e w i t h a g e d i f f e r e n c e s p r o v i d i n g a s e r i e s o f c o n t e x t s a c...

g e n e r a l o b s e r v a t i o n ( i n W U P P E R a n d M E I J E R , 1 9 9 7 a , b ) , w h i c h i s s u b s e q u e n t l y r e f i n e d a n d d e t a i l e d . T h i s l e a d s t o d e f i n i t i o n s o f a c o n s i s t e n t s e t o f n o t i o n s w i t h r e s p e c t t o w h i c h i m p o r t a n t a s p e c t s o f a r a t i o n a l d e s i g n p r o c e s s c a n b e u n d e r...

We d e s c r i b e some f e a t u r e s of a p rog ram w h i c h i n t e r p r e t s c a r t o o n s w h i c h a r e t w o d i m e n s i o n a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s o f e v e n t s i n t h e t h r e e d i m e n s i o n a l w o r l d . The m a i n p rob lems c o n f r o n t i n g t h e r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e d u r e s s tem f r o m t h e d i f f i c u l t i e s i n d e s c r i...

Q u e s t i o n 3 • M a k e s u r e t h e c h i l d w i t h l o w v i s i o n h a s h e r o w n t e x t b o o k • P u t t h e b o o k o n a r e a d i n g s t a n d . Q u e s t i o n 4 • U s e a r e a d i n g s t a n d a n d l a y t h e t e x t f l a t o n t h e s t a n d • I f n o r e a d i n g s t a n d i s a v a i l a b l e , u s e a c l i p b o a r ...

In this note we give an upper bound for λ(n), the maximum number of edges in a strongly multiplicative graph of order n, which is sharper than the upper bound obtained by Beineke and Hegde [1].

(P Xl ... X.) <-> (SOME E (EVENT E) ((gVABS F) E xl . . . xn)) In simple cases we can use the more straightforward f o r m . The l o g i c a l f o r m o f " J o h n i s k i s s i n g Mary" w o u l d s i m p l y be (KISS JOHN MARY). The l o g i c a l f o r m o f " J o h n i s g e n t l y k i s s i n g M a r y , " h o w e v e r , w o u l d be (SOME Z (EVENT E) (AND ((EWSS KZSS) Z JoHN ~ Y ) (GENT...

In this note we give an upper bound for λ(n), the maximum number of edges in a strongly multiplicative graph of order n, which is sharper than the upper bounds given by Beineke and Hegde [3] and Adiga, Ramaswamy and Somashekara [2], for n ≥ 28.

We go on along the trend of [2] and [1], giving an axiomatization of $4 ~ and proving its completeness and compactness with respect to the usual reflexive and transitive Kripke models. To reach this results, we use techniques from [1], with suitable adaptations to our specific case. 1. The axioms of $4 ~ and their correctness We assume reader's familiarity with I-2] and 1-1], so that we shall u...