Intelligent tutoring systems cover a wide range of educational processes. However, in the context of peer review methodology, there is no previous work about adaptation of the process according to the student’s profile. In this paper, a methodology for adaptive peer review is introduced. Experimental application of adaptive peer review through two courses allows to confirm pedagogical benefits ...

A recent editorial in the Journal of Wildlife Management (Krausman 2022) provided insight into duties an Editor-in-Chief (EIC). His discussion, coupled with Johnson et al. (2021) and Gould editorials regarding publication process from authors' perspectives, sparked us to share some thoughts viewpoint Associate Editor (AE). Most have or will spend a larger fraction our careers directed at publis...

A suggestion has arisen that posits that a research article peer review process using a crowd-based online protected platform analysis compares favorably with conventional peer review, concluding that it is valid and workable. The suggestion appeared in an observational crowdbased online article filled with guesses, suppositions, and fantasy, justifying a free-for-all peer review. Debate on how...

BACKGROUND There is an ongoing discussion on the provenance of toxicity testing data regarding how best to ensure its validity and credibility. A central argument is whether journal peer-review procedures are superior to Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards employed for compliance with regulatory mandates. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the rationale for regulatory decision making based ...

Compared to the traditional anonymous peer review process, open post-publication peer review provides additional opportunities -and challenges- for reviewers to judge scientific studies. In this editorial, we comment on the open peer review culture and provide some guidance for reviewers of manuscripts submitted to the Chemical Information Science channel of F1000Research.