OBJECTIVE To assess whether the completeness of reporting of health research is related to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Reporting guidelines from a published systematic review and the EQUATOR Network (October 2011). Studies assessing the completeness of reporting by using an included reporting guideline (termed "evaluations") (1990 to...

There is increasing recognition among governments and donor organizations that rigorous evaluations of public interventions should feature in the social policy decisionmaking process. Yet there is frequently a gap between the desire for information on the effectiveness of programs and an understanding of the potential and the limitations of evaluation tools. What questions can evaluations answe...

This paper presents an approach to integrate usability evaluations into Model-Driven Web development processes. Our main motivation is to define a generic usability evaluation process which can be instantiated into any concrete Web development process that follows a Model-Driven Development (MDD) approach. A preliminary version of a Web Usability Model was defined in order to support this usabi...

Dual–process models of attitudes highlight the fact that evaluative processes are complex and multifaceted. Nevertheless, many of these models typically neglect important interactions among processes that can contribute to an evaluation. In this article, we propose a multilevel model informed by neuroscience in which current evaluations are constructed from relatively stable attitude representa...

OBJECTIVE We compared teaching performance of medical school faculty using anonymous evaluations and open evaluations (in which the evaluator was not anonymous) and examined barriers to open evaluation. METHODS Residents and medical students evaluated faculty using an open evaluation instrument in which their identity was indicated in the evaluation. Following this, they completed anonymous e...