Despite the severe criticism expressed by some of the reviewers, after studying their comments and the suggested references, we still believe that our results are original, correct, and potentially important for the systems and control community. Detailed answers to the reviewers’ comments with rebuttal and explanation of the corrections/additions in the revised version of the paper are given i...

The Editors of Autopsy and Case Reports thank the peer reviewers listed below for excellent collaborative work, opinions comments on papers published in 2013. Their hard work certainly contributed to maintaining scientific level this journal.

A peer-reviewed journal would not survive without the generous time and insightful comments of the reviewers, whose efforts often go unrecognized. Although final decisions are always editorial, they are greatly facilitated by the deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, understanding of social consequences, and passion that reviewers bring to our deliberations. For these reasons, the Ed...

We believe that journal reviewers (as well as editors and dissertation or thesis committee members) have to some extent perpetuated misconceptions about common method bias in self-report measures, including (a) that relationships between self-reported variables are necessarily and routinely upwardly biased, (b) other-reports (or other methods) are superior to self-reports, and (c) rating source...

Thank you again for submitting your work to Molecular Systems Biology. We have now heard back from the three referees who agreed to evaluate your manuscript. As you will see from the reports below, the reviewers acknowledged that this work presents a potentially interesting and extensive analysis of phosphorylation network evolution in yeast. The reviewers, however, did raise a series of substa...

OBJECTIVE Interpretation of the EEG background pattern in routine recordings is an important part of clinical reviews. We evaluated the feasibility of an automated analysis system to assist reviewers with evaluation of the general properties in the EEG background pattern. METHODS Quantitative eeg methods were used to describe the following five background properties: posterior dominant rhythm...

Government regulators and systematic reviewers both aim to generate an accurate understanding of the effects of interventions. However, the methods they use, and the evidence they consider, are different. Although both focus on randomised clinical trials for determining safety and efficacy, the mostly academic community of systematic reviewers generally get their data from published reports of ...

This document reports on the T28 experiments on multi-modal interaction in bathroom design Author: Louis Vuurpijl, Stéphane Rossignol, Norbert Pfleger, Louis ten Bosch, Ralf Engel, Don Willems, Lou Boves Reviewers: Lou Boves