Calamities, Common Interests, Shared Identity: What Shapes Altruism and Reciprocity?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Trust, Fear, Reciprocity, and Altruism*
This paper uses a triadic experimental design to discriminate between actions motivated by preferences over the distribution of material outcomes and actions motivated by attributions of the intentions of others. Such discrimination is essential to empirical guidance for theory development because modeling intentions is quite different than modeling preferences. The triadic design includes the ...
متن کاملInferring Shared Interests from Tweets
Social networks have intruded into the every day’s life. Users contribute with uploading content and sharing it with friends and public. From this information knowledge on who know whom, who communicates with whom, who meets whom and who shares the shame interests with whom can be extracted. These four aspects of human behavior can provide valuable insights while designing networking algorithms...
متن کاملDirected Altruism and Enforced Reciprocity in Social Networks
We conduct online field experiments in large real-world social networks in order to decompose prosocial giving into three components: (1) baseline altruism toward randomly selected strangers, (2) directed altruism that favors friends over random strangers, and (3) giving motivated by the prospect of future interaction. Directed altruism increases giving to friends by 52 percent relative to rand...
متن کاملSocial semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.
From an evolutionary perspective, social behaviours are those which have fitness consequences for both the individual that performs the behaviour, and another individual. Over the last 43 years, a huge theoretical and empirical literature has developed on this topic. However, progress is often hindered by poor communication between scientists, with different people using the same term to mean d...
متن کاملEvolved altruism, strong reciprocity, and perception of risk.
Humans have a long history of coping with particular recurring risks. We expect natural selection to have resulted in specific physiological and psychological adaptations that respond well to these risks. Why, then, does it seem so difficult to communicate risk? We suggest that the human mind has been structured by natural selection to use a mental calculus for reckoning uncertainty and making ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Science Research Network
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1556-5068']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3873246