Comparing Traditional and “In-Motion” Intense Pulsed Light Techniques for Hair Removal: A Split Study

Background and Objectives: Hair removal is a common aesthetic concern for patients referred to dermatologists physicians. Lasers lights are one of the mainstays in management this condition. Among these devices, intense pulsed (IPLs) broadly used order reduce number width hair present. Currently techniques associated with high risk side effects, such as hyper or hypopigmentation. Materials Methods: Thirty seeking more body areas skin phototypes 1 4 were recruited perform study. All be treated divided into two equal regions; was standard IPL procedure, while other new “in-motion” technology. Results rates evaluated six months after last treatment. Results: Out 30 treated, all experienced reduction. No statistically significant difference noted among sides. A reduction pain during procedure observed technique. Conclusions: Traditional have similar results removal; technology seems guarantee better safety profile than traditional technique, well maintains same over time faster treatment time. extensive clinical study will necessary confirm our study’s results.