Dialogue for learning: Evaluator as critical friend
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
How Critical Can You Be as an On-going Evaluator?
Access to the published version may require subscription. This article discusses experiences of ongoing evaluation within a project funded by the EU Structural Funds. A question that is particularly illustrated is how we, as ongoing evaluators, have handled the dilemma between closeness and involvement in the project in relation to distance and a critical approach. This dilemma is standard with...
متن کاملDialogue as Data in Learning Analytics for Productive Educational Dialogue
This paper provides a novel, conceptually driven stance on the state of the contemporary analytic challenges faced in the treatment of dialogue as a form of data across onand offline sites of learning. In prior research, preliminary steps have been taken to detect occurrences of such dialogue using automated analysis techniques. Such advances have the potential to foster effective dialogue usin...
متن کاملDialogue and Critical Thinking 1 DIALOGUE AS MEDIUM (AND MESSAGE) FOR TRAINING CRITICAL THINKING1 by
Standard internalist approaches to critical thinking insist that critical thinkers maintain conscious, deliberate access to the reasons for their beliefs and actions. A more useful approach is externalist, focusing on the reliability of different types of processes for generating beliefs and decisions under different circumstances. We describe an externalist approach to critical thinking based ...
متن کاملCritical Dialogue in HCI: Principles as Places for Reflection
In this paper we argue that one of the major contributions of critical theory to HCI is a shift in principles that organize the selection of problems, methods, and phenomena that are considered by researchers and designers. We take this position to propose that a key area of research that is largely neglected in HCI is a systematic study of principles. More specifically we know little about the...
متن کاملDialogue Theory for Critical Thinking
A general outline of a theory of reasoned dialogue is presented as an underlying basis of critical analysis of a text of argument discourse. This theory is applied to the analysis of informal fallacies by showing how textual evidence can be brought to bear in argument reconstruction, Several basic types of dialogue are identified and described, but the persuasive type of dialogue is emphasized ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: New Directions for Evaluation
سال: 2000
ISSN: 1097-6736,1534-875X
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1174