Enforcing Concurrent Sentences

نویسندگان

چکیده

This Article is the first to take on following two questions: First, where in melange of legislative, executive, and judicial powers that constitutes law sentencing last word how much time a prisoner will serve when subject unexpired terms imposed at different times by state federal courts? Embedded question second: may convict who presents himself prison authorities his be turned away ground he has not yet completed another offense? In 2015, I began litigating behalf Jose Alberto Antonio, after finishing eight years Lancaster, California, was transferred January 11, 2021 Los Angeles five what originally designed 9.3 time. Together, Antonio repeatedly sought enforce sentence him trial court June 2016 re-sentencing for March 2013 robbery. That judge structured Antonio’s term drug conspiracy – then pronounced but commence run concurrently, meaning could no more than length longer (9.3 offense). But there seemed nothing we do prevent from running consecutively, second would until had expired (17.3 total, sum offense plus offense), though neither nor them so run. The reason sentences consecutively? Because Assistant United States Attorney negotiated plea wanted to, decision which Federal Bureau Prisons (“BOP”) its own standards defers. As recurring even “notorious” basis litigation both ultimate countless division authority between courts depend, one think legal academy have meditated this serious federalism/comity/dual sovereignty. it hasn’t. scant pertinent literature, like only relevant Supreme Court ruling, addresses mirror or reverse image, whereby structures consecutively an anticipated term. There smattering lower-court rulings point, implications somehow remained unilluminated. People v. therefore apt occasion burrow down into peculiar rift junior bureaucrats Department Justice can, perhaps without justification, force concurrent consecutively. As tract federalism, chronological study protracted identifies profound snag owes excessive correctible deference executive branch officials.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Enforcing Concurrent Temporal Behaviors

The outcome of verifying software is often a ‘counterexample’, i.e., a listing of the actions and states of a behavior not satisfying the specification. In order to understand the reason for the failure it is often required to test such an execution against the actual code. In this way we also find out whether we have a genuine error or a “false negative”. Due to nondeterminism in concurrent co...

متن کامل

Enforcing ‘Self-Enforcing’ International Environmental Agreements

Theoretical analyses of international environmental agreements (IEAs) have typically employed the concept of self-enforcing agreements to predict the number of parties to such an agreement. The term self-enforcing, however, is a bit misleading. The concept refers to the stability of cooperative agreements, not to enforcing these agreements once they are in place. Most analyses of IEAs simply ig...

متن کامل

"Linguistic" sentences and "real" sentences

This p~$r Id~ntift~ iwe klr¢ds of sentences: "llngulsUc" sentences ~ J "r~al" a~-ntence~. "l't~,~ former is a kind of sentel~'~,e~ that ar~ often discussed in (cemputatkmal) Ungulstlc literatures, sucll as the:re In i:lgure 1. The latter, on the other hand, is a kind of senteace=~ that appear in practical applications, such as those In Flgu='e 2. Where~ts both are grammatical English sentences,...

متن کامل

Some Sentences on Our Consciousness of Sentences

is provided in screen-viewable form for personal use only by members of MIT CogNet.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Social Science Research Network

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1556-5068']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3799265