Gambits: Theory and evidence
نویسندگان
چکیده
Gambits are central to human decision-making. Our goal is provide a theory of Gambits. A Gambit combination psychological and technical factors designed disrupt predictable play. Chess provides an environment study gambits behavioral game theory. based on the Bellman optimality path for sequential This allows us calculate Q $$ -values where material (usually pawn) sacrificed dynamic On empirical side, we effectiveness number popular chess natural setting as require assessment set moves (a.k.a. policy) after has been accepted. analysis uses Stockfish 14.1 optimal -values, which fundamentally measures if position winning or losing. To test whether Bellman's equation holds in play, estimate transition probabilities next board state via database expert then Gambiteer following his methodology applied Stafford reverse Boden–Kieretsky–Morphy) other common ones including Smith–Morra, Goring, Danish Halloween We build research decision-making by proving irrational skewness preference within agents chess. conclude with directions future research.
منابع مشابه
Language, Emotion and Metapragmatics: A Theory Based on Typological Evidence
Humans are equipped with some universal or language-specific abilities to recognize emotions. However, because of the different emotional contents in diverse languages and the relevant cultural differences, humans with different cultural backgrounds own different metapragmatical abilities to recognize and express emotions. A hypothesis concerning emotional effects about intonation and particle ...
متن کاملRegional Economic Differences in Iran Theory and Evidence
Increasing concern over the regional dimensions of national economic planning since 1970s, has constituted appropriate baselines for scientific analysis of regional differences The Iranian planning views in the pre and post revolution era have been examined in this article, based on both theoretical and applied study of regional differences. Then the types and degrees of convergency and/or dive...
متن کاملArgumentation and Theory or Evidence Argumentation and Theory of Evidence
The purpose of this paper is to present some new methods widely in use in argumentation theory and informal logic that have applif:ationsto the theory of evidence in law. In recent years, a new pragma-dialectical approachI to argumentation, along with developments in the analysis of logical fallacies2 and dialogue logic,3 has forged these methods together into a single new approach to the evalu...
متن کاملattribution theory and personality traits among efl learners
هدف از این تحقیق یافتن ارتباط بین نحوه نگرش زبان آموزان به موفقیت و شکستشان و نوع شخصیت آنها است. 216 زبان آموز، 111 پسر و 105 دختر، در سطح متوسط که در آموزشگاه زبان انگلیسی شکوه مشغول به تحصیل بودند در این پژوهش شرکت کرده اند. شرکت کننده ها دو پرسشنامه neo-ffi و atfll را تکمیل کرده اند. نتیجه نشان داد که: احساسات با توافق پذیری و وظیفه شناسی ارتباط مثبت و با روان نژندی ارتباط منفی دارد. تصور ا...
15 صفحه اولEvidence Against Evidence Theory (?!)
STRESZCZENIE This paper is concerned with the apparent greatest weakness of the Mathematical Theory of Evidence (MTE) of Shafer [27], which has been strongly criticized by Wasserman [37] the relationship to frequencies. Weaknesses of various proposals of probabilistic interpretation of MTE belief functions are demonstrated. A new frequency-based interpretation is presented overcoming various dr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1526-4025', '1524-1904']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2684