H1–semistability for projective groups
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Enumerating projective reflection groups
Projective reflection groups have been recently defined by the second author. They include a special class of groups denoted G(r, p, s, n) which contains all classical Weyl groups and more generally all the complex reflection groups of type G(r, p, n). In this paper we define some statistics analogous to descent number and major index over the projective reflection groups G(r, p, s, n), and we ...
متن کاملcharacterization of projective general linear groups
let $g$ be a finite group and $pi_{e}(g)$ be the set of element orders of $g $. let $k in pi_{e}(g)$ and $s_{k}$ be the number of elements of order $k $ in $g$. set nse($g$):=${ s_{k} | k in pi_{e}(g)}$. in this paper, it is proved if $|g|=|$ pgl$_{2}(q)|$, where $q$ is odd prime power and nse$(g)= $nse$($pgl$_{2}(q))$, then $g cong $pgl$_
متن کاملRelatively projective groups as absolute Galois groups
By two well-known results, one of Ax, one of Lubotzky and van den Dries, a profinite group is projective iff it is isomorphic to the absolute Galois group of a pseudo-algebraically closed field. This paper gives an analogous characterization of relatively projective profinite groups as absolute Galois groups of regularly closed fields.
متن کاملGroups of piecewise projective homeomorphisms
I 1924, Banach and Tarski (1) accomplished a rather paradoxical feat. They proved that a solid ball can be decomposed into five pieces, which are then moved around and reassembled in such a way as to obtain two balls identical to the original one (1). This wellnigh miraculous duplication was based on Hausdorff’s (2) 1914 work. In his 1929 study of the Hausdorff–Banach–Tarski paradox, von Neuman...
متن کاملLifts of projective congruence groups
We show that noncongruence subgroups of SL2(Z) projectively equivalent to congruence subgroups are ubiquitous. More precisely, they always exist if the congruence subgroup in question is a principal congruence subgroup Γ(N) of level N > 2, and they exist in many cases also for Γ0(N). The motivation for asking this question is related to modular forms: projectively equivalent groups have the sam...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0305-0041,1469-8064
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004116000384