How Robust Are Value Judgments of Health Inequality Aversion? Testing for Framing and Cognitive Effects
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Commentary: Value Judgments in Health Inequality Measurement
Commentary V alue judgments lurk beneath the surface in any study of health inequalities; analysts ought to understand them, make them explicit, and present results transparently to poli-cymakers so that they, rather than analysts, decide which set of value judgments should be invoked. that is the key message of the paper " Lies, Damned Lies, and Health Inequality measurements " 1 Kjellsson et ...
متن کاملInequality aversion, health inequalities and health achievement.
This paper addresses two issues. The first is how health inequalities can be measured in such a way as to take into account policymakers' attitudes towards inequality. The Gini coefficient and the related concentration index embody one particular set of value judgements. By generalising these indices, alternative sets of value judgements can be reflected. The other issue addressed is how inform...
متن کاملthe effects of cognitive strategies- note making and underlining- on iranian efl learners’ reading comprehension
هدف از انجام این مطالعه ، بررسی اثرات استفاده از استراتژی های شناختی یعنی "نت برداری" و "زیر خط کردن" بر روی عملکرد درک مطلب زبان آموزان ایرانی می باشد. به این منظور، 60 زبان آموز دختر سال چهارم دبیرستان از طریق آزمون پیشرفت زبان انگلیسی (نلسون)، از یک جامعه آماری بزرگتر انتخاب شدند. سپس به صورت تصادفی به سه گروه که هر گروه شامل ?0 دانش آموز همسان بود، تقسیم شدند: دو گروه آزمایش(گروه "نت برداری...
15 صفحه اولInequality aversion and risk aversion
This note shows that for two inequality averse social welfare functions, if one is more inequality averse than the other, the household preference induced by optimally allocating aggregate bundles according to this social welfare function is more risk averse than the other. We present examples showing that this comparative static can be reversed if inequality aversion is dropped. We show that t...
متن کاملHow automatic are social judgments?
Do people infer personality dispositions automatically when they encode behavior? Tulving's encoding-specificity paradigm was adapted to test three operational indicants of automatism: absence of intention, of interference from other mental activity, and of awareness. Recruited for a digit-recall study, subjects read sentences describing actions during the retention interval of either an easy o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Medical Decision Making
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0272-989X,1552-681X
DOI: 10.1177/0272989x17700842