Inside Guidelines: Comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Inside guidelines: comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries.
OBJECTIVE To compare guidelines on diabetes from different countries in order to examine whether differences in recommendations could be explained by use of different research evidence. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We analyzed 15 clinical guidelines on type 2 diabetes from 13 countries using qualitative methods to compare the recommendations and bibliometric methods to measure the extent of ov...
متن کاملHealth Expenditures in Developing Countries: Determinants and Guidelines
Background: In this paper, the health expenditures function of developing countries is estimated with a panel data model. Methods: All credible determinants of health expenditures in these countries are probed and their coefficients are found out. Variables that affect health expenditures in developing countries are income, demographic features, social characteristics, and technological progr...
متن کاملTreatment for neuropathic pain in patients with cancer: comparative analysis of recommendations in national clinical practice guidelines from European countries.
INTRODUCTION Neuropathic pain is a common symptom, present in 39% of the patients with cancer pain. Treating this type of pain is challenging, as this patient group is often frail and has comorbidities which increase the risk of side events and hence influences their quality of life. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can be helpful for clinicians, especially when scientific evidence is uncert...
متن کاملcomparative analysis of the use of hedges & emphatics in english and persian academic research articles of sociology & psychology
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولHow Evidence-Based Are the Recommendations in Evidence-Based Guidelines?
BACKGROUND Treatment recommendations for the same condition from different guideline bodies often disagree, even when the same randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence is cited. Guideline appraisal tools focus on methodology and quality of reporting, but not on the nature of the supporting evidence. This study was done to evaluate the quality of the evidence (based on consideration of its int...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Diabetes Care
سال: 2002
ISSN: 0149-5992,1935-5548
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.11.1933