Judgments of spatial extent are fundamentally illusory: ‘Additive-area’ provides the best explanation
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Are Intentionality Judgments Fundamentally Moral?
C onsiderable evidence documents the foundational role that judgments of intentionality play in human social cognition. Even before their first birthday, children distinguish intentional from unintentional behavior and soon learn to recognize the goals and beliefs that motivate intentional action. Adults’ judgments of intentionality are grounded in a sophisticated concept in which they consider...
متن کاملInference to the Best Explanation
Our initial survey of the problems of induction and explanation is now complete. We have considered some of the forms these problems take, some of the reasons they are so difficult to solve, and some of the weaknesses in various attempts to solve them. In the last chapter, I also attempted something more constructive, by giving what I hope is an improved version of the causal model of explanati...
متن کاملenvironmental effects of gol-e-gohar iron ore mine on groundwater of the area
gol-e-gohar iron ore mine of sirjan in southern part of iran is a large open pit that operates below the groundwater table and during mining operation, dewatering is required to prevent operation processes from flooding. current operation is going on by digging wells in or out of the pit and pumping to prevent flooding. as a result of the former dewatering operation a vast deep cone of depressi...
Judgments of discrete and continuous quantity: an illusory Stroop effect.
Evidence from human cognitive neuroscience, animal neurophysiology, and behavioral research demonstrates that human adults, infants, and children share a common nonverbal quantity processing system with nonhuman animals. This system appears to represent both discrete and continuous quantity, but the proper characterization of the relationship between judgments of discrete and continuous quantit...
متن کاملSpatial conditionals and illusory inferences
Studies of reasoning often concern specialised domains such as conditional inferences or transitive inferences, but descriptions often cut across such domains, for example: If the circle is to the left of the square then the triangle is to the right of the square. The square is to the right of the circle. The triangle is to the right of the square. Could all three of these assertions be true at...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Cognition
سال: 2020
ISSN: 0010-0277
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104439