Jury direction – an antipodean experiment
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Online Branding: An Antipodean Experience
Australia and New Zealand enjoy high per-capita internet usage and have a small group of organizations that have succeeded globally on the web despite less capitalization and fewer resources. The author, a web pioneer and identity expert, examines how they have instead leveraged brands and intellectual capital, and looks at implications for all {rms wishing to incorporate a web element to their...
متن کاملThe Cobb-Douglas Production Function: An Antipodean Defence?
In this paper a re-examination of the original time-series data sets used by Professor Douglas and associated researchers to establish the existence of an aggregate production function is undertaken. Particular attention is paid to the issue of whether the data provide deductive support for the ‘Laws of Production’ as claimed by Douglas (1948). Various statistical methods are used to analyse th...
متن کاملAn Introduction to Natural Experiment Studies
در دو سخن سردبیری شماره‌های قبل به مطالعات مداخله‌ای (Interventional and/or experimental studies) [1] و مطالعات نیمه تجربی (studies Quasi-experiment) [2] پرداختیم. همان جا، به این نکته اشاره کردیم که برای اندازه‌گیری کارآیی یک دارو، واکسن، برنامه بهداشت عمومی و متغیرهای دیگری از این دست، مطالعات مداخله‌ای بهترین گزینه هستند. تقسیم تصادفی و کورسازی از مؤلفه‌های اساسی یک مطالعه مداخله‌ای است [1]....
متن کاملImproving the Jury System: Reducing Jury Size
Within the last several years there has been increasing concern over the rising costs of California's legal system. Many within and outside of the legal community have focused their attention on the issues of caseload volume, delay and congestion within California courts as a result of the rising number of civil and criminal cases. These mounting concerns have spawned a growing movement for cou...
متن کاملAn Experimental Study of Jury Deliberation
We study the e¤ects of deliberation on collective decisions. In a series of experiments, we vary groupspreference distributions (between common and conicting interests) and the institutions by which decisions are reached (simple majority, two-thirds majority, and unanimity). When deliberation is prohibited, di¤erent institutions generate signi cantly di¤erent outcomes, tracking the theoretica...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Amicus Curiae
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2048-481X,1461-2097
DOI: 10.14296/ac.v2016i107.4941