Measuring objectification through the Body Inversion Paradigm: Methodological issues
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Commentary “The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact?”
Recently, Bernard, Gervais, Allen, Campomizzi, and Klein (2012) reported that individuals were less able to recognize inverted vs. upright pictures of sexualized men as compared to women. Based on their formulation of the sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis (SBIH) it was concluded that sexualized women as compared to men are perceived in a more object-like manner supporting sexual objectificat...
متن کاملMethodological issues in measuring coercion
Methods 928 patients, aged 18–60, admitted to acute psychiatric wards in the Nordic countries were interviewed focusing on their experiences during admission. We used a questionnaire where both the MacArthurPerceived Coercion Scale (MPCS) and "The Coercion Ladder" (CL; a ten step visual analogue scale) were included. Information from medical records was obtained and participants were assessed b...
متن کاملMethodological issues in measuring alcohol use.
Various methodological issues influence the measurement of alcohol consumption in surveys. One factor is the reference period for which questions are asked--that is, whether respondents are asked for an exact recall of their intake during a short, recent period or for a summary of their drinking behavior over a longer period, such as the past year. Longer recall periods provide sufficient time ...
متن کاملMethodological issues in measuring health disparities.
OBJECTIVES This report discusses six issues that affect the measurement of disparities in health between groups in a population: Selecting a reference point from which to measure disparity. Measuring disparity in absolute or in relative terms. Measuring in terms of favorable or adverse events. Measuring in pair-wise or in summary fashion. Choosing whether to weight groups according to group siz...
متن کاملMeasuring relational norms: some methodological issues
This study questions the validity of the operationalisations of Macneil’s norms which have been used in published studies. It compares the evaluation of two B2B exchanges using features that are fundamental to arguments which underpin Macneil’s concepts. The discrepancies between the results are statistically significant.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: PLOS ONE
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229161