Medical Peer Reviewing: Key Points to Keep in Mind
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Keep it in Mind
Quantum physicist Wolfgang Pauli expressed disdain for sloppy, nonsensical theories by denigrating them as “not even wrong,” meaning they were just empty conjectures that could be quickly dismissed. Unfortunately, many remarkably popular theories of consciousness are of this ilk—the idea, for instance, that our experiences can somehow be explained by the quantum theory that Pauli himself helped...
متن کاملKeep nanotechnology in mind.
Machine learning — the implementation of computational tasks that involve learning from experience — is inevitably inspired by the working principles of biological brains. However, the von Neumann architecture characteristic of conventional computers is intrinsically different from the brain’s architecture. Aside from macroscopic differences such as the overall digital nature of the signal proc...
متن کاملCharge for peer reviewing
“There’s no such thing as a free lunch” is an adage described over one century ago, which became popular by Professor Milton Friedman, in 1975. It came to my mind when reading the interesting editorial by Pasternak and Glina.(1,2) Working on both sides, as an author of journals and a reviewer, I am aware of the importance of a good review. It is powerful to enhance the description of results in...
متن کاملThe Peer-Reviewing Game
We model a family of peer-reviewing processes as gametheoretic problems. The model helps to understand elements of existing peer-reviewing procedures, and to predict the impact of new mechanisms. The peer-reviewing for evaluation of scientific results submitted to conferences involves complex decision processes of independent participants. Significant tax-payer money is spent by governments for...
متن کاملJSCI Editorial Peer Reviewing Methodology
The Peer Review Methodology Used in the Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics is Based on three-tier reviews: open (or non-blind), double-blind, and participative reviews. Final acceptance depends of the three kinds of reviews but a paper should be recommended by nonblind reviewers AND blind reviewers in order to be accepted for publication. A recommendation to accept made by non-b...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
سال: 2020
ISSN: 2249-782X
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2020/19581.13607