On covering intersecting set-systems by digraphs
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Covering digraphs by paths
The problems of miniiiwn Lg.: ana minimum vertex covers by paths results relate to papers by Galki-M&ram, Meyniel, Alspach-Pullman and mait resulti is contimed with partially ordered sets. are discussed. The others. One of tie NM+oak The terminology is rather standard, generally following Berge [3]. In any case where ar&iguity may arise we give +finiticns. Graphs alnd digraphs are f@ite, except...
متن کاملUnion-Intersecting Set Systems
Three intersection theorems are proved. First, we determine the size of the largest set system, where the system of the pairwise unions is l-intersecting. Then we investigate set systems where the union of any s sets intersect the union of any t sets. The maximal size of such a set system is determined exactly if s + t ≤ 4, and asymptotically if s + t ≥ 5. Finally, we exactly determine the maxi...
متن کاملCovering Intersecting Bi-set Families under Matroid Constraints
Edmonds’ fundamental theorem on arborescences [4] characterizes the existence of k pairwise edge-disjoint arborescences with the same root in a directed graph. In [9], Lovász gave an elegant alternative proof which became the base of many extensions of Edmonds’ result. In this paper, we use a modification of Lovász’ method to prove a theorem on covering intersecting bi-set families under matroi...
متن کاملOn Partial Covering For Geometric Set Systems
We study a generalization of the Set Cover problem called the Partial Set Cover in the context of geometric set systems. The input to this problem is a set system (X ,S), where X is a set of elements and S is a collection of subsets of X , and an integer k ≤ |X |. The goal is to cover at least k elements of X by using a minimum-weight collection of sets from S. In the geometric version, X typic...
متن کاملOn Set Systems Having Paradoxical Covering Properties
1. R2-phenomena . Our set theoretic notation will be standard with one exception . Since this paper is largely concerned with powers of ordinals, the symbol ~" will always denote ordinal exponentiation for ordinals ~, 11 . Thus, in particular, if fl--a, then cos is an ordinal <coy+1 . When we use cardinal exponentiation we shall either say so or, if there is no danger of confusion, we write 2 1...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Discrete Mathematics
سال: 2001
ISSN: 0012-365X
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-365x(00)00381-2