On the relation of a distributive lattice to its lattice of ideals
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
EMBEDDING OF THE LATTICE OF IDEALS OF A RING INTO ITS LATTICE OF FUZZY IDEALS
We show that the lattice of all ideals of a ring $R$ can be embedded in the lattice of all its fuzzyideals in uncountably many ways. For this purpose, we introduce the concept of the generalizedcharacteristic function $chi _{s}^{r} (A)$ of a subset $A$ of a ring $R$ forfixed $r , sin [0,1] $ and show that $A$ is an ideal of $R$ if, and only if, its generalizedcharacteristic function $chi _{s}^{...
متن کاملembedding of the lattice of ideals of a ring into its lattice of fuzzy ideals
we show that the lattice of all ideals of a ring $r$ can be embedded in the lattice of all its fuzzyideals in uncountably many ways. for this purpose, we introduce the concept of the generalizedcharacteristic function $chi _{s}^{r} (a)$ of a subset $a$ of a ring $r$ forfixed $r , sin [0,1] $ and show that $a$ is an ideal of $r$ if, and only if, its generalizedcharacteristic function $chi _{s}^{...
متن کاملTotal graph of a $0$-distributive lattice
Let £ be a $0$-distributive lattice with the least element $0$, the greatest element $1$, and ${rm Z}(£)$ its set of zero-divisors. In this paper, we introduce the total graph of £, denoted by ${rm T}(G (£))$. It is the graph with all elements of £ as vertices, and for distinct $x, y in £$, the vertices $x$ and $y$ are adjacent if and only if $x vee y in {rm Z}(£)$. The basic properties of the ...
متن کاملOn lattice of basic z-ideals
For an f-ring with bounded inversion property, we show that , the set of all basic z-ideals of , partially ordered by inclusion is a bounded distributive lattice. Also, whenever is a semiprimitive ring, , the set of all basic -ideals of , partially ordered by inclusion is a bounded distributive lattice. Next, for an f-ring with bounded inversion property, we prove that is a complemented...
متن کاملOn Recovering a Bounded Distributive Lattice from Its Endomorphism Monoid
The sub algebra functor Sub A is faithful for Boolean algebras (Sub A •Sub B implies A • B, see D. Sachs [7] ), but it is not faithful for bounded distributive lattices or unbounded distributive lattices. The automorphism functor Aut A is highly unfaithful even for Boolean algebras. The endomorphism functor End A is the most faithful of all three. B. M. Schein [8] and K. D.' Magill [5] establis...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society
سال: 1972
ISSN: 0004-9727,1755-1633
DOI: 10.1017/s0004972700045226